Everything behind the tracker (71 sources): the reports feed, every credible source cited on the main page, background reading, and a separate list of sources cited with caution.
Reports
Newest first (19 items). Our monitoring adds headlines from major outlets automatically. "Checked" means our software fetched the full report and confirmed it supports its headline. "Reviewed" means an editor checked it against its source. "Auto" items have not been checked yet. Tap a label for our note. None of this is an endorsement. Our assessment is the rating on the main page.
reviewed ⚠ ▾Caution: One judge, not the state, issued the suspension order, and police say they secured the grounds but did not enter the building.An editor checked this report against its source. (2026-10-30)Poland suspends top judges as battle over rule of law escalates(Financial Times)
reviewed ▾Our note: Profile of the judge: a former court president who clashed with PiS’s justice ministry and now heads the Themis judges’ association.An editor checked this report against its source. (2026-10-30)Awantura o Trybunał. Wyjaśniamy, kim jest Anna Korwin-Piotrowska(Business Insider Polska)
reviewed ▾Our note: Tusk’s statement, plus constitutional scholar Jacek Zaleśny’s view that the suspension has no legal basis.An editor checked this report against its source. (2026-10-30)Walka o Trybunał. Tusk reaguje: Innej drogi nie ma(Zero.pl)
reviewed ▾Our note: Police say they are not inside the Tribunal building, took no action against its guards, and are responding to disinformation.An editor checked this report against its source. (2026-10-30)Komunikat Komendy Stołecznej Policji(Warsaw police (X))
These are not independent evidence. We link them only as the record of a claim we examine, or of a party’s own position, and say why next to each one. Facts on the tracker come from the sources above.
XDonald Tusk on X, Oct. 29— a party's own post; linked as the record of the government's framing, never as evidence (cited under “The government and parliament’s judges”)
XNigel Farage on X, Oct. 30— claimant's own post, cited as the record of the claim; police say they never entered the building (cited under “The US and European national-conservative right”)
XLiz Truss on X, Oct. 30— the claimant's own post; linked as the record of the claim, never as evidence (cited under “The US and European national-conservative right”)
XAlexander Dugin on X, Oct. 30— Russian ideologue's own post; linked as the record of the Moscow frame, never as evidence (cited under “The US and European national-conservative right”)
XCynical Publius on X, Oct. 30— the claimant's own post; linked as the record of the claim, never as evidence (cited under “The US and European national-conservative right”)
XAdrian Vermeule on X, Oct. 30— a commentator's own post; linked as the record of his framing, never as evidence (cited under “The US and European national-conservative right”)
XGrzegorz Braun on X, Oct. 30— the claimant's own post; linked as the record of the claim, never as evidence (cited under “Poland’s anti-Ukraine far right”)
XUS Ambassador Tom Rose on X, Oct. 30— the official's own statement; linked as the record of the US position, never as evidence of the facts (cited under “What is actually known”)
Warsaw Metropolitan Police (X)Warsaw police statement on the Tribunal, Oct. 30— social-media post, linked as the record of what was said, not as evidence (cited under “What is actually known”)
XJarosław Kaczyński on X, Oct. 30— the claimant's own post; linked as the record of the claim, never as evidence (cited under “How the story traveled”)
XBeata Szydło on X, Oct. 30— the claimant's own post; linked as the record of the claim, never as evidence (cited under “How the story traveled”)
XJack Posobiec on X, Oct. 30— the claimant's own post; linked as the record of the claim, never as evidence (cited under “How the story traveled”)
XBalázs Orbán on X— Hungarian government official's own account; linked as the record of the claim (cited under “How the story traveled”)